Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Medical Tech Outlook
THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING
By
MedTech Outlook | Monday, October 31, 2022
Consumers and surgeons have increasingly turned to computer-based simulation as simulation technology companies have pursued ever-higher realism over the past decade.
FREMONT, CA: In the past ten years, computer-based simulation has increased in influence, strength, and appeal among customers and surgeons as simulation technology companies strive for more realism. Until the early 2000s, the available computational power limited the fidelity of simulations. The revolution in computer graphics cards enabled the gaming industry to achieve enormous advances in speed, graphics, and usability. Parallel to the adoption of gaming engines and technologies, medical simulation teams are programming with unprecedented detail, effectively mapping surgical processes involving tissues, surfaces, deformations, cutting, and bleeding with realistic visual and tactile outcomes.
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
DATA'S INCREASING ROLE IN DRIVING INNOVATION IN SURGICAL SIMULATION
Education simulation technology that does not generate quantifiable data will soon become obsolete as data-driven evaluation gains traction in the business world. Over time, box trainers or simulated operations that don't assess a surgeon's skills will become obsolete. Those technologies that benefit patients and are easy to understand by surgeons will endure.
For instance, the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA), a pioneer in the advancement of minimally invasive orthopedic surgery, has devised a method for quantifying the specific successes and failures of surgical treatments. These data points, known as "Copernicus metrics," create a straightforward, binary method for judging whether an operation is being conducted successfully and following the expert panel's goals.
Using this kind of performance evaluation, simulation firms can build new forms of evaluations to validate accomplishment in a simulated environment and comprehend the influence of virtual surgical instruction on students. This new data use can be incorporated into simulation training software, providing learners with real-time performance reports and feedback, and quantifying a previously qualitative process.
It is certain that as the market expands, data will drive the business and the increasing use of simulation. Virtual reality simulation technology has helped lead the drive to acquire data that cannot be replicated in the operating room or with traditional surgical teaching methods, such as cadavers and training boxes.
PATIENT-RECORDED OUTCOMES COULD TRANSFORM PATIENT CARE EVALUATION
Results from simulated surgical procedures supported by quantitative data may have a greater impact than merely enhancing initial surgeon training. As these evaluations grow more widespread in healthcare, they may eventually be utilized to support the concept of patient-reported outcomes (PRO). PRO uses patient health, safety, and experience as the major success indicators to validate the efficacy of medical procedures and the competence of the doctors or surgeons who conduct them.
Imagine rotator cuff surgery, for example, which has multiple phases. These processes can be incorporated into a training simulator to give surgeons detailed instructions on doing the procedure correctly. Once a surgeon has had extensive training in these procedures, they can be evaluated on characteristics such as accuracy, efficiency, and speed. When training is fully integrated with surgical procedures, this evaluation can also be tied to how well the patient heals after surgery, if they have full mobility, and whether they may require readmission. A system with PHR at its core provides a means to link all of these dots and, eventually, enhance patient care.
Currently, this concept faces obstacles. Healthcare systems do not facilitate open data networks because of privacy concerns and malpractice lawsuits. The current fragmented incentives between doctors, hospitals, and insurers are likely to impede the implementation of PRO.
Medical simulation firms must first collaborate with associations and institutions to demonstrate that simulation training results in favorable outcomes for both the surgeon and the patient to validate this notion. The sector must demonstrate to healthcare systems how altering their reimbursement procedures may compensate surgeons by tying surgical training to patient outcomes. This kind of data flow throughout a patient's whole treatment pathway, including feedback systems during surgery linked to PROs, is still a few years away. Still, if completely achieved, it might drastically alter how people define success in the medical sector.
More in News
I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info
